- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 26 September 2024
- Bench
- Budi Habung
- Case no.
- I.A.(Civil) 801/2023
Judgment
ORDER 27-09-2024 Heard Mr. S.D.Purkayastha, learned counsel for the applicants. Steps upon the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 were taken on 10.04.2023. Although more than a year has passed, the A/D card has not been returned till date. In view of the above, the notice upon the respondent is treated to have completed. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of delay of 197 days in preferring the Civil Revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the order dated 29.04.2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Nagaon in M.J.Case No. 01/2020, whereby the application filed by the applicant/appellant for condonation of delay in preferring the connected appeal was rejected. The ground for delay in not preferring the connected Civil Revision petition has been stated in para 8 of the delay condonation petition. On perusal and on consideration of the grounds stated in para 8 (a),(b),(c),(d),(e),(f),
(g) and (h), this Court is of the view that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause for preferring the connected Civil Revision petition within the stipulated period of time. Page No.# 4/4 Since the respondents have not appeared despite of notice being served, it is presumed that the respondents have no objection for condoning the delay. In view of the above, delay of 197 days in filing the Civil Revision Petition is hereby condoned. Registry shall number the connected Civil Revision Petition and place the same for admission. Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
PageoNo.#o1/4 GAHC010059722023 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oI.A.(Civil)/801/2023o PABITRAoBORAoANDo2oORS.o S/O-oLATEoMOHANoBORA,oR/O-oVILL.-oCHOTHAoHAIBOR,oNAZIRAJAN,o MOUZA-oNIZ-SAHAR,oPIN-o782003,oP.O.oANDoP.S.oNAGAONoSADAR,oDIST.o NAGAON,oASSAM 2:oPUNYAoPRABHAoBORA oD/O-oLATEoMOHANoBORA oR/O-oVILL.-oCHOTHAoHAIBOR oNAZIRAJAN oMOUZA-oNIZ-SAHAR oPIN-o782003 oP.O.oANDoP.S.oNAGAONoSADAR oDIST.oNAGAON oASSAM 3:oPIKUMONIo@oPINKIoBORA oD/O-oLATEoMOHANoBORA oR/O-oVILL.-oCHOTHAoHAIBOR oNAZIRAJAN oMOUZA-oNIZ-SAHAR oPIN-o782003 oP.O.oANDoP.S.oNAGAONoSADAR oDIST.oNAGAON oASSAo VERSUSo SANDHYAoRANIoROYoANDo4oORS.o W/O-oSRIoHARIoCHARANoROY,oR/O-oVILL.-oMILANPUR,oADARSHAoNAGAR,o NEARoNAMoGHAR,oPIN-o782001,oP.O.oANDoP.S.oNAGAONoSADAR,oDIST.o NAGAON,oASSAM 2:BISWAoBIPULoBORA oS/O-oLATEoMOHANoBORA Page No.# 2/4 R/O- VILL.- CHOTHA HAIBOR NAZIRAJAN MOUZA- NIZ-SAHAR PIN- 782003 P.O. AND P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 3:GITANJALI BORA D/O- LATE MOHAN BORA R/O- VILL.- CHOTHA HAIBOR NAZIRAJAN MOUZA- NIZ-SAHAR PIN- 782003 P.O. AND P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 4:TARULATA BORA D/O- LATE MOHAN BORA R/O- VILL.- CHOTHA HAIBOR NAZIRAJAN MOUZA- NIZ-SAHAR PIN- 782003 P.O. AND P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSAM 5:MAMONI BORA D/O- LATE MOHAN BORA R/O- VILL.- CHOTHA HAIBOR NAZIRAJAN MOUZA- NIZ-SAHAR PIN- 782003 P.O. AND P.S. NAGAON SADAR DIST. NAGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S D PURKAYASTHA, MS. B. BANIA Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : Page No.# 3/4 PABITRA BORA AND 2 ORS VERSUS SANDHYA RANI ROY AND 4 ORS (B) ------------ Advocate for : MR. S D PURKAYASTHA Advocate for : appearing for SANDHYA RANI ROY AND 4 ORS (B) BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.