VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

M/S Sharp Eye Advertising Pvt Ltd v. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2017
Bench
S. Ravindra Bhatauthor, Sanjeev Sachdeva
Case no.
W.P.(C) 10450/2015

Judgment

O R D E R %

14.11.2017 The petitioner had sought directions to carry out the tender process and execute the agreement to the extent of Lot No. 1 and Lot No. 2. The petitioner was aggrieved by the letter dated 16.10.2015 informing that the tender had been cancelled. It has been informed on behalf of Delhi Transport Corporation i.e. respondent that the security deposit amount for the two lots i.e. Rs. 18,50,000/- and Rs. 28,53,000/- will be refunded. This is in the form of communication to the DTC's standing counsel. A copy of the same is hereby taken on record. W.P.(C) 10450/2015 Page 2 A direction is therefore issued to the DTC to ensure that the security deposit amount is refunded to the petitioner within two weeks from today. The petition is accordingly disposed of. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J NOVEMBER 14, 2017 'rs'

Case details

Parties and counsel

W.P.(C) 10450/2015 Page 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10450/2015 M/S SHARP EYE ADVERTISING PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Nandita Abrol, Adv. versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kr. Tripathi, Standing Counsel with Mr. Rizwan, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel, SDMC with Mr. Ashish Tiwari and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.