Sharad Kumar Aggarwal v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

O R D E R %

19.11.2025

¶1Learned proxy counsel for the Petitioner submits that the local counsel is in Ajamgarh. The main counsel has died. He has been requested to seek an adjournment.

¶2The record shows that the Criminal Petitions have been filed to challenge the Order on Charge dated 31.08.2016 framed by the learned CMM, New Delhi in FIR No. 24/2009 in CRL.M.C. 5029/2017 and FIR No.140/2009 in CRL.M.C. 5030/2017. This Order was challenged before the Learned ASJ in CR. No. 29/2017 in CRL.M.C. 5029/2017 and CR. No. This is a digitally signed order. 30/2017 in CRL.M.C. 5030/2017 but the same also got dismissed vide Order dated 06.07.2017. After filing of these Petitions, the record shows that consistently adjournments have been taken in these matters.

¶3Learned APP for the State, submits that aside from taking adjournments here, the Accused are also stalking the trial, before the learned Trial court.

¶4Considering the consistent adjournments being sought, it is evident that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present Petitions, as well as, the Applications, which are hereby dismissed for non-prosecution.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025/RS This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5029/2017, CRL.M.A. 19872/2017 (stay) SHARAD KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given) versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State. + CRL.M.C. 5030/2017, CRL.M.A. 19874/2017 (stay) SHARAD KUMAR AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Counsel for Petitioner (appearance not given) versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA