VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Numaligarh Refinery Ltd (Nrl) v. Ram Kumar Gupta & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2017
Bench
Rajiv Sahai Endlawauthor
Case no.
CM(M) 1283/2017

Judgment

O R D E R %

14.11.2017

CM No.40987/2017 (for exemption)

¶1Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶2The application is disposed of. CM (M) 1283/2017 & CM No.40986/2017 (for stay)

¶3This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 17th January, 2015 of the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) of this Court in CS(OS) No.2149/2009 which since then, upon enhancement of the minimum pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court, has been transferred to the District Court.

¶4The Joint Registrar decides certain matters as prescribed in Rule 3, Chapter II of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1967 as a delegatee of this Court, exercising Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, and a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India does not lie against the order of a Judge of this Court exercising Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction himself or though his delegatee. Reference, if any required, can CM(M) 1283/2017

be made to (i) Udey Singh Todar Singh Vs. State of Haryana AIR 1971 P&H 284; and, (ii) Anil Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Shaurya Sunil AIR 2016 Pat 59.

¶5The remedy of the petitioner / defendant is to prefer a Chamber Appeal, if lies, under Rule 4, Chapter II of the Delhi High Court Rules, against the order of the Joint Registrar.

¶6A Chamber Appeal in fact was preferred but the same was dismissed in default and an application for restoration of the same is stated to have been filed.

¶7The counsel for the petitioner / defendant will have to request the Additional District Judge before whom the suit is now pending, for placing the file before the Registrar of this Court for hearing of the application for restoration of the appeal.

¶8Be that as it may, this petition is not maintainable and is dismissed.

No costs.

Dasti.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J NOVEMBER 14, 2017 'gsr'..

CM(M) 1283/2017

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1283/2017 NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD (NRL) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Avneesh Garg, Ms. Reshmi R. Sinha & Mr. P. Sinha, Advs. Versus RAM KUMAR GUPTA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.