- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 13 November 2017
- Bench
- Vibhu Bakhru
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10025/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
13.11.2017
¶1Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice.
¶2The principal grievance of the petitioner is that his application for a passport has been kept on hold. The petitioner alleges that the petitioner's application for passport has not been processed solely on the ground that the petitioner's parents are of Tibetan origin.
¶3The petitioner claims that he was born on 14.05.1979 and therefore, is a citizen of this country by birth. The petitioner alleges that although the petitioner is a citizen of this country, the respondents are taking a view that since the petitioner is born of parents of Tibetan origin, there is a doubt as to his nationality.
¶4The above issue has been examined by this Court in several decisions and the issue has been decided in favour of the applicants. (See: Namgyal Dolkar v. Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs: W.P.(C) 12179/2009, decided on 22.12.2010; Phuntsok Wangyal v. Ministry of External Affairs & Ors: W.P.(C) 3539/2016 and other connected matters decided on 22.09.2016; and Karma Gyaltsen Neyratsang v. Union of India & Ors: W.P.(C) 6074/2014, decided on 29.08.2017 ).
¶5In this view, the present petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for a passport within a period of four weeks from today having regard to the aforesaid decisions rendered by this Court
¶6In the event, if the respondents find that there is any other justifiable ground to refuse the passport, the same would be communicated to the petitioner within the aforesaid period of four weeks. The passport would be issued only on the petitioner surrendering his RC/IC.
¶7Order dasti under the Signatures of the Court Master. VIBHU BAKHRU, J NOVEMBER 13, 2017 MK
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10025/2017 GOMPO DORJEE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Simarpal Singh Sawhney and Mr Sidhant Krishan Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Gaurang Kanth, CGSC with Ms Eshita Baruah, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.