- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 13 November 2017
- Bench
- Sanjiv Khanna, Prathiba M. Singh
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10016/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
13.11.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that owing to subsequent developments after filing of the present writ petition, the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition. He seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file another writ petition, if required and necessary. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, the respondents would be entitled to contest the new writ petition by making reference to the pleadings made in the present writ petition. SANJIV KHANNA, J PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J NOVEMBER 13, 2017 j
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10016/2017 SHUBH IMPEX ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms.Nidhi Saini, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT), ICD, TUGHLAKABAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.