- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 10 November 2017
- Bench
- Pratibha Rani
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 3131/2017
Judgment
O R D E R %
10.11.2017
CRL.M.A.18427/2017
¶1Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
¶2The application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 3131/2017
¶1By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 Cr.P.C, the petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No.0415/2017, under Sections 354/354A/506 IPC, PS Jahangir Puri and proceedings arising thereof.
¶2Notice. Learned APP as above accepts notice on behalf of the State.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a bare reading of the FIR and the complaint filed by the complainant/respondent No.2 the basic ingredient of the Section 354/354A/506 IPC are not satisfied. W.P.(CRL) 3131/2017
¶4Learned APP for the State submits that investigation is still under progress.
¶5As the investigation is still going on, merely on the basis of the contents of FIR, it is not for this Court to form an opinion whether necessary ingredients for the offence under Section 354/354A/506 IPC stands satisfied.
¶6The writ petition is dismissed. CRL.M.A.18426/2017 (stay)
In view of the above the application is dismissed as infructuous.
PRATIBHA RANI, J. NOVEMBER 10, 2017 'hkaur'
W.P.(CRL) 3131/2017
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3131/2017 DR SURENDER PAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Narender Singh Yadav & Mr.Abhishek Yadav, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.