- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 3 September 2015
- Bench
- Manmohan
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 7752/2015
Judgment
ORDER %
03.09.2015 Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent-TPDDL states that respondent shall disconnect the electricity connection in ■favour of M/s. Building Care Inc. and shall transfer the same in favour of M/s. Vardhman Fortune Mall Welfare Association (Regd.). Ms. Naina Kejriwal, learned counsel for petitioner in W.P.(C) 8122/2015 states that petitioner shall apply for transfer of the said electricity connection and comply with all commercial formalities within a period of one week. Mr. Manish states that the security deposit, if any, lumished by M/s. Building Care Inc. and M/s. Cool Care Inc. shall be refunded to the sole proprietor/proprietorship concern within a period of two weeks. The statements made by Mi". Manish Kumar Srivastava as well as Ms.Naina Kejriwal, learned counsel are accepted by this Court and respondents are held bound by the same. In view thereof, the present petitions and applications are disposed of. Order dasti. U MANMOHAN, J SEPTEMBER 03, 2015 js
Case details
Parties and counsel
r 1^- j 5 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7752/2015 & CM APPLs. 15261/2015 AND 16871/2015 ASHOK RAGPIAV Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate with Mr. Varun Garg, Advocate. versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Advocate for TPDDL. Ms. Naina Kejriwal, Advocate for applicant/Vardhman Fortune Mall Welfare Association (Regd.). With + W.P.(C) 7755/2015 & CM APPLs. 15280/2015 AND 16870/2015 ASFIOK RAGHAV Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advocate with Mr. Varun Garg, Advocate. versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Advocate for TPDDL. Ms. Naina Kejriwal, Advocate for applicant/V ardhman Fortune Mall Welfare Association (Regd.). And -6 r + W.P.(C) 8122/2015 & CM APPLs. 16872/2015 AND 16873/2015 VARDHMAN FORTUNE MALL WELFARE ASSOCIAIION (REGD.) Petitioner Through: Ms. Naina Kejriwal, Advoeate. versus TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LTD. AND ANR. Respondents Thi'ough: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Advocate for TPDDL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.