- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 31 October 2017
- Bench
- Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 495/2017
Judgment
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. OCTOBER 31, 2017 'gsr'
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 31st October, 2017. + RC.REV. 495/2017 M/S A.K. WOOLEN INDUSTRIES & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Mr. Ashwini Kumar & Ms. Somya Priyadarshini, Advs. Versus SHRI NARAIN GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Lalit Gupta with Mr. Siddharth, Mr. Karan Singh Rajpurohit & Mr. Harsh Panwar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Caveat No.933/2017 1. The counsel for the caveator / respondent has appeared. 2. The caveat stands discharged. CM No.39137/2017 (for exemption) 3. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 4. The application is disposed of. RC.REV. 495/2017 & CMs No.39135/2017 (for stay) & 39136/2017 (for condonation of 42 days delay in re-filing the petition) 5. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 17th May, 2017 in CIS No.80568/2016 (Old E. No.135/2016) of the Court of Rent Controller (RC), Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi] of dismissal of the application of the petitioners / tenants for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent / landlord and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioners / tenants from Shop No.602, Ground Floor, Main Road, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006. 6. The counsel for the petitioners / tenants has been heard and the copies of the Trial Court record filed with the paper book perused. The counsel for the respondent / landlord has during the course of hearing also handed over a paper book containing the certified copies of the entire Trial Court record. 7. The counsel for the petitioners / tenants, on enquiry, states that the petitioners / tenants are not controverting that the respondent / landlord is the owner of the shop in the tenancy of the petitioners / tenants and that there is a relationship of landlord and tenant between the petitioners / tenants on the one hand and the respondent / landlord on the other hand. Thus the discussion hereinafter will be confined only to the aspect of bona fide requirement and availability of alternate suitable accommodation. 8. The respondent / landlord instituted the petition for eviction from which this petition arises, pleading i) that the respondent / landlord is the sole proprietor of M/s J.P. Cotton Mills and is engaged in the business of narrow woven fabrics (Niwar), ropes, hook and loop tapes, cordage etc.; ii) that the office / store of the aforesaid business is situated in property No.4663, Gali Mohar Singh Jat, Pahari Dhiraj, Delhi which is a residential ancestral property; iii) that the respondent / landlord is in possession only of a small portion at the first floor of the said property from where he is carrying on his business aforesaid; iv) that the other portions of the said property No. 4663, Gali Mohar Singh Jat, Pahari Dhiraj, Delhi are in possession of the brother of the respondent / landlord and the sons of another brother of the respondent / landlord; v) that property No.4663, Gali Mohar Singh Jat, Pahari Dhiraj, Delhi is even otherwise situated in a very narrow lane / gali where there is no vehicular movement and only two wheelers and manual cycles can ply; vi) that the same causes inconvenience to the respondent / landlord in bringing in and taking out the goods; vii) that the respondent / landlord requires the Shop No.602, Ground Floor, Main Road, Sadar Bazar, Delhi in the tenancy of the petitioners / tenants for carrying on his aforesaid business; viii) that Sadar Bazar is even otherwise one of the largest, busy and reputed retail and wholesale market of Asia / India; ix) that the elder son of the respondent / landlord viz. Sanjay Gupta is running his independent and exclusive business in the name and style of M/s J.P. Fibres; x) that the younger son viz. Bharat Gupta of the respondent / landlord is running his independent and exclusive business in the name and style of M/s Jawahar
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.