- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2016
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 4228/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
11.11.2016 Crl. M.A. No. 17645/2016 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4228/2016 and Crl. M.A. No. 17644/2016 (stay)
¶1By this petition the petitioners seek quashing of complaint case being CC No. 534/01 (renumbered as CC No. 10312/2016) titled as 'Sanjay Kumar vs. M/s Srishaila Constructions Pvt. Ltd.' pending in the Court of Ms. Swati Singh, learned Metropolitan Magistrate.
¶2The pleas taken by the petitioners in the present complaint are that the cheque was issued as a guarantee/surety and that fabricated documents have been placed along with the complaint, which pleas can be considered only at the stage of trial and not in a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. However, considering the nature of defence sought to be placed by the petitioners, CRL.M.C. 4228/2016
learned Trial Court would consider the application for grant of exemption from appearance in accordance with law.
¶3Petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 11, 2016 'vn'
CRL.M.C. 4228/2016
Case details
Parties and counsel
20# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4228/2016 SRISHAILA CONSTRUCTIONC PVT LTD & ORS..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Trideep Pais, Mr Naman Joshi and Mr. Devashish Chauhan, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.