VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Pardeep Kumar v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
11 November 2016
Bench
S.P.Gargauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 2311/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

11.11.2016 CRL.M.A.No.17624/2016 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 2311/2016

¶1The petitioner seeks regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.313/2016 registered under Sections 326/341/324/506/195A/34 IPC at PS Mundka. Status report not filed.

¶2I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioner is in custody since 22.09.2016. The investigation is complete. It is informed that FIR No.204/2015 under Sections 308/354/506/341/120B/34 IPC and FIR No.610/2015 under BAIL APPLN. 2311/2016 Sections 452/323/34 IPC have already been registered against the complainant. Cross-case vide FIR No.314/2016 has also been registered against the other party.

¶3Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the period already spent in custody, the petitioner is admitted to bail on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

¶4The bail application stands disposed of.

¶5Order 'dasti.'

S.P.GARG, J. NOVEMBER 11, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 2311/2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2311/2016 PARDEEP KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Ashok, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. Mr.Aditya Aggarwal with Mr.Surendra, Advocate, for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.