VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Sonu Sonkar v. State

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
11 November 2016
Bench
Vipin Sanghiauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 3209/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

11.11.2016

The status report tendered in court is taken on record. It is pointed out that Ms. Gori is not the real sister and not even the cousin sister of the petitioner.

The said position is verified from the ration card as well. It is further stated that the petitioner and the father of the girl to be married are just neighbours. Mr. Kundu states on the basis of the nominal roll tendered in court that the petitioner has already been out on four occasions on parole/ furlough in this year itself, which adds upto about 11 weeks i.e. almost three months.

Considering the aforesaid, I am not inclined to grant parole to the petitioner. Dismissed.

VIPIN SANGHI, J NOVEMBER 11, 2016 sr

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3209/2016 SONU SONKAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC with ASI Jaipal, PS Adarsh Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.