- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 4 November 2016
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10456/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
04.11.2016
C.M. Nos.40990/2016 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application disposed of. W.P.(C) 10456/2016 & C.M. Nos.40991/2016
Petitioner is aggrieved by the show cause notice dated
10.11.2014, demolition order dated 20.11.2014 and the sealing order dated 21.11.2014 passed by the Competent Authority qua his property i.e. plot bearing no.73 and 74, part of Khasra No.507 situated in Lal Dora of Village Burari, Delhi.
On advance notice, learned counsel for respondent has put in appearance. His submission is that this Court is not the correct Forum and the petitioner has alternate remedy before the ATMCD. His additional submission being that period of limitation has expired that is why the petitioner has approached this Court. This Court notes the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforenoted orders were not communicated to the petitioner but had been sent to one Mr.Vineet who was not the owner of the property. On this issue learned counsel for respondent submits that these communications/notices were issued to the occupier/owner and Mr.Vineet was in occupation of the plot in the ground floor and the constructions which are now being raised from ground floor to third floor are illegal The petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy against the sealing and demolition orders to assail the same before the appropriate Forum i.e. ATMCD. Petition disposed of in the above terms.
INDERMEET KAUR, J NOVEMBER 04, 2016 ndn
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10456/2016 SAHIL CHHABRA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Mr.G.D.Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.