Neeraj Kumar v. State (Nct of Delhi)

ORDER

11.11.2016 / r By the present petition ; the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR .V , /:' : Bawana oh the cphiplaiht 'of coniplainant.; Tn custody for, more than twp months ahci charge-sheet qua hiin has already /been filed. Recoveries if any whatever required td be made have already Learried APP for the ,State opposing the bail submits, that, the two ; ■;' other co-accused3are yet - to fe i^estpd and the. petitioner is ^the^ main ;::/ accused.-:' -/r/, "■■■ .. BAILAPPLN. 2195/2016 : V > r' In the ajboveHnbted FIR Complainant alleged that when she was present in her house along with her husband Mukesh! ^d her daughter, the petitioner who is the cousin brother of her husband Iqiocked the door at ; 10,20 PM. Petitioner was accompanied by 3-4 Other persons who were : canying danda sticks, and iron road. > The petitioner pushed aside -the complainant and attacked her husband Mukesh with iroii rod and gave blow;s on his head. He also misbehaved, with the complainant and inappropriately ' touched her and abused her. Mukesh >vas rushed to the hospital and as per the MLC he received grievous injuries; ' i Be that as it may the petitioner has been in custody for more than two ; months. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The co-aCcused Deepak has , been granted bail whereas Prince has been granted anticipatory bail. The , , ^ trial is likely to take some time for the reason two accused are yet to be arrested. Recoveries, have already been made froni the petitioner. Consequently, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond iri the sum of ?25i0G0/- : with one surety of the , , iike amount subject to the satisfaction of the leartied Trial Court fluther • -subject to the condition that he will not leave the Couiitiy without the prior permission of the Court concerned. . , . . ^ Petition .is disposed of. Order dasti. ' NOYEMBER11,2016 'ga' BAILAPPLN. 2195/2016 MUKTA GUPTA, J. page 2 of 2 i • K-"' ,

* IN THE HIGH GOtJRT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI; ^.N^RAJ.KUMAR V-, . -■ ■■ /; ."■■ ■. . ..... Petitioner' ; ' Represented by: Mr. Saiirabh Shokeen, Adv. ' /versus,. ; STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ^ ^ ..... Respondent /'<. Represented by:. Ms. MeenakshlGhauh^, APP ■ y-: with SI Uday Singh, PS Bawana;. -. ■: >" ; ' ■ ■ -. / • ■CORAM: ' " . . ' / HQNDLE MS. JUSTICE :/ ',v. ' • V