- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 18 May 2016
- Bench
- Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ashutosh Kumar (Dhjs)
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 3679/2014
Judgment
O R D E R %
18.05.2016
Learned counsel for the parties submits that the valuation of the suit property for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction is less than two crores and plaintiff's address is falls within the jurisdiction of Central District. Though addresses of defendants 1 to 3 are outside the territory of Delhi and cause of action was also arose in the plaintiff company which falls within the jurisdiction of Central District as such requests to send the matter before the Ld District & Session Judge ( Central District), Tis Hazari Court , Delhi.
In view of the submission and facts alleged in the present case, the matter be sent to the Ld District & Session Judge, (Central District) Tis Hazari Court.
Parties be directed to appear before the Court of Ld District & Session Judge (Central District), Tis Hazari Court on 12.08.2016 .
The suit files be made available to the Ld District & Session Judge ( Central District ) at Tis Hazari Court the date fixed.
DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS)
JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
MAY 18, 2016 SK
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 3679/2014 LIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: appearance not given versus PANKAJ KUMAR & ORS ..... Defendant Through: Mr Sandeep Srivastava, Adv for D1 & 2 This case has been received from the Court of Sh Ashutosh Kumar (DHJS) Joint Registrar (Judicial) CORAM: DR. SATINDER KUMAR GAUTAM (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.