VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Pramod Kumar v. The Sho Ps Punjabi Bagh

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
7 November 2016
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 1842/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

07.11.2016

By the present petition the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.500/2016 under Sections 376/506/109/120B/34 IPC registered at PS Punjabi Bagh.

The allegations of the prosecutrix against the petitioner who was her maternal uncle are that she went to the house of her uncle on 28th June, 2015 and when she was going upstairs to take bath she saw her cousin and the petitioner in an objectionable position where after she was dragged into the room and was raped by the petitioner. Though the subsequent allegations are against the cousin sister and not the petitioner, however in view of the allegations for the incident dated 28th June, 2015 and there is no apparent BAIL APPLN. 1842/2016

cause of enmity between the families, I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.

Petition is dismissed.

MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 07, 2016 'ga'

BAIL APPLN. 1842/2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1842/2016 PRAMOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ashesh Lal, Mr. Raghav Parwatiyar, Advs. versus THE SHO PS PUNJABI BAGH ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with ASI Puja Saini PS Punjabi Bagh. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.