Subhash Academy v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr

O R D E R %

05.01.2016 CM No.173/2016 (for impleadment) and CM No.174 / 2016

¶1The first application, being: CM No.173/2016 is moved by the following four applicants for impleadment as respondents in the writ petition:-

(i). Smt. Sheetala Devi, wife of Late Jugal Kishor Saxena

(ii). Suprabhash Saxena, son of Late Jugal Kishor Saxena

(iii). Avinash Chandra Saxena, son of Late Jugal Kishor Saxena

(iv). Devesh Kumar Saxena, son of Late Jugal Kishor Saxena

¶2This application is not maintainable in view of the fact that the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution on 15.09.2015. The application, being: CM No.173/2016 is, accordingly, dismissed.

¶3Resultantly, the application filed for condonation of delay in re-filing, being: CM No.174/2016 has been rendered infructuous. W.P.(C) 4621/2015 The same is accordingly dismissed. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J JANUARY 05, 2016 yg W.P.(C) 4621/2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4621/2015 SUBHASH ACADEMY ..... Petitioner Through: None versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Niraj Srivastava, Advocate for the applicants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER