- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2016
- Bench
- Valmiki J. Mehta
- Case no.
- RSA 330/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2016
¶1Counsel for the appellants/plaintiffs states that since the suit filed was a simplicitor suit for injunction without claim of declaration to the title, the subject suit was dismissed as appellants were not found to be in possession of the suit property on the date of filing of the suit, the appeal is prayed for being withdrawn with liberty, in accordance with law, to file a suit for declaration with consequential relief with respect to the suit property.
¶2The appeal is accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 07, 2016 ib
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 330/2016 & CM No. 41144/2016 (delay of 10 days in filing the appeal) & CM No. 41145/2016 (delay of 29 days in re-filing the appeal) ANUJ TYAGI & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Atul Kr. Sharma, Advocate. versus ASHOK KUMAR & ORS ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.