Tarun Sheinh v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr

O R D E R %

15.11.2017 Mr. Rajiv Mohan, learned advocate for the petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to state that the interim order which was granted in favour of the petitioners shall stand vacated. However, this shall not prevent the petitioner from entering into any negotiations with the investors and come into a settlement. In case, settlement is arrived at, the petitioner may have the liberty to approach this Court again. ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J NOVEMBER 15, 2017 nd

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1358/2017, Crl.M.A. No. 7489/2017 (Stay) TARUN SHEINH ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajiv Mohan, Advocate with Mr. Jaspreet Singh and Mr. M.A. Karthik, Advocates along with Petitioner-in- person versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for State. Mr. R.M. Bagai, Advocates for Dr. Tilottama Negi, Mr. Bhawan Singh Negi and Ms. Shurila Nishchal Mr. Sumit Thakur and Mr. Divy Pratap, Advocates for R-2 Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate for complainantas/buyers Mr. Sanjay Gupta H/O Ms. Santosh Kansal (one of complainant) Insp. Shambhu Nath, P.S. EOW CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR