- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 September 2015
- Bench
- G.S.Sistani, Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 8086/2014
Judgment
O R D E R %
23.09.2016 CM APPL. 28904/2015.
This is an application filed by respondents no.2 and 3 seeking enlargement of time in completing the inquiry proceedings.
Learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3 submits that the order dated
15.9.2012 was passed in the absence of respondents no.2 and 3 and the same was brought to the notice of respondents no.2 and 3 around 28.10.2015, which has resulted in delay in completing the proceedings. Counsel further submits that as a last opportunity, time may be extended by two months to enable respondents no.2 and 3 to conclude the inquiry.
Heard. Having regard to the submissions made, present application is allowed. Time is extended by two months to enable respondents no.2 and 3 to conclude the proceedings. We make it clear and as agreed no further opportunity will be granted to respondents no.2 and 3 in this regard. As agreed by the parties, petitioner shall appear before the Inquiry Officer on 29.9.2016 at
2.00 p.m.
Application stands disposed of.
Let a copy of this order be given DASTI under the signature of Court Master to the counsel for the parties.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J SEPTEMBER 23, 2016 msr /
W.P.(C) 8086/2014
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8086/2014 SATYA PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Through : Ms.Meenu Maini, Adv. along with the petitioner. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Sanjay Katyal, Adv. for respondents no.2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.