- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2016
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 2483/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
08.11.2016 On the complaint of respondent no.2, present FIR No.450/2014 under Sections 420 IPC was registered at police station Aman Vihar. Respondent no.2 has alleged in the FIR that he had paid `2,34,500/- to the petitioners for admission of his son and daughter in Department of Training and Technical Education. However, petitioners did not procure admission. They also did not return money. Petitioners and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes before Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 7th January, 2015 on the terms and conditions recorded in the proceedings of learned Mediator. Respondent no.2 is present in Court and admits having settled the matter before the Mediation Centre. He also admits having received the entire settled amount. He submits that he has no objection in case FIR is quashed. Keeping in mind the facts that parties have settled the matter before the Mediation Centre and respondent no.2 has received the entire settled amount and does not wish to pursue the FIR any further, in the interest of justice, FIR No.450/2014 under Sections 420 IPC registered at police station Aman Vihar is quashed. Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 08, 2016/dk
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2483/2016 VISHAL KUMAR GAURAV & ANR ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Ashish Chopra and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advs. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Adv. for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with SI Bineet Pandey, Legal Cell/OD. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.