Trimble Europe Bv v. Ministry of Shipping & Ors

O R D E R %

08.11.2016

The learned counsel for the petitioner informed us that although they have been able to effect service on respondent no.7 for this hearing, but they are not inclined to appear before this court. It, therefore, transpires that the petitioner which was in a joint venture with respondent no.7 was jointly the bidder in the present tender. Since the respondent no.7 is not willing to come forward, the petitioner cannot, on its own, maintain this petition. Consequently, the petition is disposed of. Interim order stands vacated. The writ petition stands disposed of.

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J NOVEMBER 08, 2016/ns

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7073/2016 & CM No.29090/2016 TRIMBLE EUROPE BV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Anshu Bhanot with Mr Anuj Mirdha, Advs. versus MINISTRY OF SHIPPING & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr Aditya Dewan, Adv. for R-1 and R-2. Mr R.V. Sinha with Mr A.S. Singh, Advs. for R-3. Mr Manoj V. George with Ms Shilpa M. George, Advs. for R-4. Mr Pramod B. Agarwala with Mr Aayush Agarwala, Mr Anuj P. Agarwala and Mr Himanshu Gautam, Advs. for R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR