- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 3 December 2012
- Bench
- Rajiv Saiiai Endlaw
- Case no.
- LPA 790/2012
Judgment
ORDER
03.12.2012
¶1This intra court appeal impugns the orders dated 19th Novemb er,2012 and 26'h November, 2012 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.716312012,
¶2However, what we find is that the order dated 19th Novemb er,2012 is an order with the consent of the appellant. The appellant subsequently attempted to withdraw the said consent and which was not permitted vide order dated 26th Novemb er, 2012. The appellant in this appeal appearing through a different counsel has sought to blame the senior counsel who had appeared for him on 19th November,2012 and which attempt, is not only to be nipped in the bud but also to be deprecated th ? LPA No.790/2012 Page I of2 t
¶3There is no merit in this appeal, lmposmg any costs. DECEMBER 03, 2012 Bs.. LPA No.790/2012 which is dismissed. We refrain from CHIEF'JUSTICE a RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW. J
Case details
Parties and counsel
-\l $-29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF' DELHI AT NEW DELI{I LPA 79012012 & CM No.2008712012 (for stay) SHER SINGH BARSHAMI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bansla and Mr. Aditya Kumar Choudhary, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Hitesh Matik and Ms. Nupur Choudharv. Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAIIAI ENDLAW
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.