VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Chandresh Goel v. Mukesh Kumar

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 November 2016
Bench
Manmohanauthor
Case no.
CONT.CAS(C) 1002/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

15.11.2016

Present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the undertaking and order dated 29th October, 2015 passed in RCT No.171/2013, wherein the respondent-objector undertook to pay the occupation charges of Rs.1200 per month w.e.f. 10th February, 2008 within ninety days and further undertook to deposit Rs.1200 per month on or before 15th day of each calendar month from November, 2015. Learned counsel for petitioner states that despite the aforesaid undertaking, arrears of occupation charges w.e.f. 10th February, 2008 have not been deposited till date. In the opinion of this Court, since by undertaking dated 29th October, 2015, the order passed by the learned ARC stood modified, the petitioner has an alternative effective remedy by filing execution proceedings. Consequently, the present contempt petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate legal proceedings in accordance with law.

MANMOHAN, J NOVEMBER 15, 2016 KA

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1002/2016 & C.M.No.31993/2016 CHANDRESH GOEL ..... Petitioner Through Mr.S.S.Jain, Advocate. versus MUKESH KUMAR ..... Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.