- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 23 November 2010
- Bench
- Veena Birbal
- Case no.
- TR.P.(C.) 68/2010
Judgment
ORDER %
23.11.2010 TR.P.(C.) 68/2010 & CM 20909/2010 Present is a transfer petition filed under Section 24 of CPC praying for transfer of eviction petition filed by the petitioner from Saket courts to Patiala House Courts. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that an eviction petition bearing No.E-79/2010 was filed against the respondent in respect of property at 138-A, Golf Links, New Delhi, before the Rent Controller, Patiala House Courts wherein the-respondent had been served and had also filed a leave to defend application. It is submitted that on the starting of Courts at Saket the aforesaid petition has been transferred to Saket Courts and is presently pending disposal there before CCJ/ARC/ACJ (South District). It is stated that before the said court, the respondent has moved an application contending Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. that the eviction petition has to be tried at Patiala House courts and not at the Sal<et court. The said application is pending consideration and next date fixed is 04.12.2010. Learned counsel has submitted that to avoid any technical objection, the petitioner prays that the aforesaid eviction petition may be transferred to Patiala House courts. It may be mentioned that the application in this regard is already pending consideration before the learned trial court at Saket and is listed for hearing on 04.12.2010. The controversy of jurisdiction is still pending consideration before learned ARC at Saket courts. Under these circumstances, it will not be appropriate to pass any order at this stage on this petition. The petition therefore stands dismissed. VEENA BIRBAUJ NOVEMBER 23, 2010 srb
Case details
Parties and counsel
.^7 40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + TR.P.(C.) 68/2010 GARDENIA ESTATES PVT LTD Petitioner Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta with Mr. Kamal Gupta, Adv. versus BHARTI LAIQ ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.