- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 November 2011
- Bench
- Sunil Gaur
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 8304/2011
Judgment
ORDER 2s.11.2811. CM No. 18766/201 1 (u/S 15 1 CPC)
¶1Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM No.18764/291 1 (.u/S 15 1 CPC)
¶1There is delay of 11 days' in re-filing of the accompanying petition.
¶2Notice.
¶3Mr. Sumeet Pushkaran, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of l respondents. .
¶4For the reasons stated inPara-2 & 3 of the application, the same is allowed and delay of 11 days' in re-filing the petition is condoned.
¶5Application stands disposed of. oh WP.(C) No.8304/2071 Page L Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. W.P.(C) No.8304/2011
¶1Learned counsel for {he petitioner does not press this petition on merits in view of the fact that the petitioner has already retired on 30.9.2011, but prays that tilt March, 2Ql2 petitioner be not evicted from the premises in question, as he has two school going daughters, who are studying in nearby school.
¶2Notice.
¶3Mr. Sumeet Pushkaran, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents and states that there are others in the queue who are also waiting for the allotrnent and they should not be deprived of the legitimate expectation of being allotted the premises in question.
¶2IJpon weighing the equities, it is deemed appropriate to permit the petitioner to remain in the premises in question till 31.12.2011, subject to payment of the outstanding dues, including the current occupation charges.
¶3With directions as aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.
¶4Copy of this order be given dqsti to counsel representing both sides. CM No.18765/201 1 (u/S 151 CPC) Dismissed as infructuous. t_--_ :stsNIL GAUR. J NOVEMBER 25.2OII rS W.P.(C) No.B304/2011 Page2
Case details
Parties and counsel
, $-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + w.P.(c) 83041201r MURARI LAI' ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Malaya Chand, Mr.M.S.Bhatia & Mr.S.P. Mitra, Advocates versus DELHI JAL BOARD AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.