Vishal Goswami & Ors v. State & Ors

ORDER %

23.11.2011 Crl. M.A. No. 18263/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No. 3859/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 96/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at PS Seemapuri, Delhi. The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Sarika Sabharwal is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent CRL.M.C. 3859/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. on 5^'' September,2011. As full and fmal settlementof all the claimsofthe Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. I has to pay ^8.50 laldis out of which T5.50 lakhs have already been paid to her and ?3 laklis have been paid to her vide Demand Draft No. 849720 dated 5'*^ October, 2011 drawn on Canara Bank, Rohini. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 96/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at PS Seemapuri, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 23,2011 CRL.M.C3859/2011 ^^ ^^

MUKTA GUPTA, J. Page2of2 ^ v

66# IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI^ + CRL.M.C. 3859/2011 VISHAL GOSWAMI & ORS Petitioners Through: Mr. R.P. Luthra and Ms. Jasmine Detwani, Advocates with Petitioners in person. versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State with SI Hukum Singh, PS Seema Puri. Mr. Pavitra Mohan Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No. with Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA