- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 23 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3855/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
23.11.2011 Crl.M.A. 18250/2011 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3855/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 591/2001 under Sections 498AIPC registered at PS Rajouri Garden, New Delhi. The complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Ravneet Kaur is present in person and is identified by her counsel. She states that the Petitioner and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent No. CRL.M.C. 3855/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. r-2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner has already paid ^ 6,90,000/-. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful puipose will be sei*ved in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create fiarther acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 591/2001 under Sections 498A IPG registered at PS Rajouri Garden, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acloiowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. NOVEMBER 23,2011 'ga' CRL.M.C 3855/2011 ,1 ^ 1\AAjdL MUKTA GUPTA,J page 2 of2 \ ^ \A
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3855/2011 BIPLAB DATTA Petitioner Through Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Sunil Gautam, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State Mr. Vinod Asri, Adv. for R-2 with R- 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.