- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 25 November 2011
- Bench
- Mx. Mehta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3853/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
25.11.2011 CrLMA 18248/2011 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 3853/2011 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of the FIR No.511/2009 under Sections 279/304A IPG registered at Police Station Sector 23, Dwarka, New Delhi on the ground that the parties inter se have compromised the matter. The parties are present in person and are identified by their respective counsels. Respondents no.2 and 3 namely Smt. Vibha Devi. Mr. Sunil Pandey 3 are present in person. They are the wife and brother of deceased. In addition to what has been received by respondents no.2 and 3 as per order passed by learned MAGT, a further sum of Rs. 1 lac has been paid today to the respondents no.2 and 3 by the petitioner i.e. Rs.60,000/- to respondent no.2 and Rs.40,000/- to respondent no.3. Since the interest of the parents of the deceased has already been taken care of by the learned MAGT and the fact that the respondents no.2 and 3 have compromised the matter with the petitioner, no useful purpose would be Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. served in keeping the present FIR alive. Consequently,the petition is allowed and FIR No.511/2009 under Sections 279/304A IPC registered at Pohce Station Sector 23, Dwarka, New Delhi and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. NOVEMBER 25, 2011 rd MX. MEHTA,J
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3853/2011 RAJENDER SINGH Petitioner Through: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State with W/ASI Ramwati Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for R-2 andR-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.