- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 23 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3880/2011
Judgment
ORDER o/o
23.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 668/1994under Sect 498A/406 IPG registered at PS Sultan Puri, Delhi. The complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Ms. Kusum Lata is present in person and is identifiedby her counsel. She statesthat the Petitioners RespondentNo.2/Complainanthave enteredinto a Compromise.In tern the settlement,marriagebetweenthe PetitionerNo. 1 and Respondent :r tiers It Itate uri. ^vith ions and IS of No. 2/complainanthas been dissolvedby a decreeof divorce. As part oi'full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1has agreedto pay ^ 9,16,000/-which is lying depositedin the form of CRL.M.C.3880/2011 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. FDR before the learned Trial Court. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved th^ir differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful puipose will be sei-ved in continuanceof the proceedings, rather ;he same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 668/1994 under Sections 498A/406 IPC registered at PS Sultan Puri, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. The Respondent/complainantwill be entitledto receivethe amountof ? 9,16,000/- along with the interest that may have accrued thereon lying before the learned Trial Court in the form of FDR. Parties have signed this order sheet in aclaiowledgment of their statements made before this Court. ^ The petitionand the pendingapplicationare disposedof. Orderdasti. MUKTA GUPTA,J NOVEMBER 23, 2011/'ga' ^ CRLM.C 3880/2011 page2 6f2
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3880/2011 & Crl.M.A. 18313/2011 (stay) DHARAMVEER@DHARAMBIR& ANR Petition Through Mi\ S.K. Gulati, Adv. with petitio in person. versus STATE & ORS Responde Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for J with SI Premvir Singh, PS Sultanp Mr. R.K. Burman, Adv. for R-2 R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.