VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2012 › High Court of Delhi

Chander Prakash & Ors v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
9 November 2012
Bench
V.K. Shaliauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3832/2011

Judgment

,.; '(1' \ ,) 'i ','1' ',' bt : '.1 --- ;j . 'i ;.(1, '.: 11 -, ;) ., r----' J' " 'i ,)"" J .\ 'i J",

09.11.2012 Present: Ms.Sunita Arora, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State. + Crl.M.C. No.3832/2011

¶1This is a petition for quashing of FIR no.393/2003, u/S 498A/406/34 IPC registered by PS R.K.Puram. The ground for quashing of the aforesaid FIR is the settlement of matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the respondent no.2. In terms of the said settlement, the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2 have got their marriage dissolved by a decree of divorce on 14.9.2011. It has also been stated that in terms of the said settlement, copy of which is placed at page no.23, the petitioner no.1 has given an amount of to the respondent no.2 and the minor daughter towards full and final settlement of her entire claim.

¶2The petition is supported by the affidavits of all the three petitioners.

¶3The petitioner no.1 & respondent No.2 are present in Court and are duly identified by the learned counsel fo'r the petitioners. On enquiry, respondent No.2 has stated that she has received an amount of She has further stated that she has no I r: ,/''1 ;"l'j' objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR and the 'J' It consequent proceedings as she has obtained divorce from the ,"! petitioner no.l. " 'j.

¶4Having regard to the aforesaid facts that the matrimonial disputes have been resolved and parties have been divorced, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings alive.

¶5Accordingly, FIR no.393/2003, u/S 498A/406/34 IPC registered j'lt by PS R.K.Puram and the consequent proceedings a? V.K. SHALl, 1. NOVEMBER 09, 2012 C),' 'I i-' i't, :..-_--'< " '1 ', __

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.