Naveen Saini & Ors v. State & Ors

# % 30.11.2010 Present: Mr. Abhay Kushwaha & Ms. Vandana Sharma, Advs. for the Petitioner. Mr. U.L. Watwani, APP for the State. Mr. Rajiv Hooda, Adv. for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. + Crl. M.C. No. 3594/2010 •k Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married sometime in the year 2001. They could live together for hardly about three years. On the complaint of respondent No. 2, FIR in question was registered. Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are relatives of petitioner No. 1. Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 have resolved their disputes amicably before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Center in the year 2009. In terms of settlement, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 have even obtained decree of divorce by mutual consent from the court of Additional District Judge, Delhi I on 23'"'^ July, 2010. A sum of ^2 lacs had already been paid to respondent No. 2 by petitioner No. 1 tiU decree of divorce was granted. Remaining settled amount of ^1,25,000/- has been paid by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No. 2 by way of pay order. A Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. photocopy whereof has been placed on record. Respondent No. 2 has no objection if the FIR m question is quashed. Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties and in the larger interest I quash the FIR No.618/2005 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPG registered at police station Tilak Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. itK. PATHAK,J. NOVEMBER 30, 2010 rb