M.P.Gupta v. UOI & Anr

ORDER %

02.06.2011

¶1The instant appeals pertain to lands situated in the revenue estate of village Ghevra, and the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 with which I am concerned was issued on 6.2.2003.

¶2The Reference Court has assessed the compensation @ ?1,18,367/- besides other statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894.

¶3Deciding a batch of appeals lead matter being LA.APP No.489/2008 Chiranii La! Vs. UP! & Anr. today itself, with reference to a decision dated 19.12.2008 passed by a Division Bench deciding LA.APP.No.193/2006 Pratao Singh (through LRs) Vs. UO! & Ors. I have determined the fair market value of the lands in village Ghevra at ^4,03,425/- per bigha as of 6.2.2003.

¶4The appeals stand disposed of decreeing the same enhancing the compensation payable to the appellants @?4,03,425/- per bigha; additionally decreed that the appellants would be entitled to the statutory benefits as per the Land Acquisition Act 1894 including the decision of the Supreme Court reported as 93 (2001) DLT 569 Sunder Vs. Union ofIndia.

¶5The appellants would also be entitled to proportionate costs.

¶6Pending applications, if any, in the appeals stand disposed of in terms of the prayer made in the application. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG,J. June 2, 2011 dk

$-24-33, 35-39, 67-71 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LA.APP.24/2009 RAJ SINGH & ORS. LA.APP.25/2009 CHOTU & ANR. LA.APP.34/2009 SHRI BRAHMA Appellants Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. LA.APP.36/2009 RISHI RAJ RANA & ANR. Appellants Through; LA.APP.47/2009 M.P.GUPTA LA.APP.48/2009 RAGHUBIR SINGH LA.APP.55/2009 BHULLAN @ BHULE & ANR. Appellants •• Taklar, Advocate for DDA. LA.APP.56/2009 M.P.GUPTA & SONS Versus .Appellants + LA.APP.57/2009 MEHAR SINGH & ORS. .Appellants Versus LA.APP.58/2009 SANJEEV TUSHIR .Appellants ' Versus LA.APP.127/2009 JAI NARAYAN & ORS Versus + LA.APP.85/2009 LAKH I RAM Versus + LA.APP.78/2009 GURDEV SINGH .Appellants .Appellant .Appellant Versus LA.APP.77/2009 RAJ SINGH (D) THRU LRS .Appellants Versus + LA.APP.76/2009 NISHA GUPTA Versus LA.APP.340/2010 RATTAN SINGH .Appeiiant Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. I_A.APP.341/2010 CHARAIM SINGH & ORS. Appellants Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. LA.APP.342/2010 RAGHUBIR SINGH l_A.APP.343/2010 ANGOORI & ORS. Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. Appellants Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + l_A.APP.344/2010 HEM CHANDER SHARMA DECD. THR LRs Mr.Kuldeep Balhara, Advocate and Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEPNANDRAJOG