VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Maharaj Singh @ Mohan & Anr v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
16 November 2011
Bench
Mukta Guptaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 1570/2011

Judgment

ORDER %

16.11.2011 Crl. M.A. No. 17920/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to ail just exceptions. W.P. (Crl.) 1570/2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 410/2010 under Sections 420/468/467/461/120B IPC registered at PS Mandawali Fazad Pur, Delhi. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners and Respondent No. 2 are residing at the address mentioned in the paper book and the original documents regarding the property has already been seized W.R(CRL) 1570/2011 by the Investigating Officer which fact has been verified by the learned Additional Standing Counsel on instructions from SI Narender Kumar. The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Manju Devi is present in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She states that the dispute between the parties regarding the ownership of Plot No. 369, Khasra No. 510, D-Block, Laxmi Garden, Indira Puri, Loni Ghaziabad has been settled and it has been agreed that the Petitioner No. 2 and the Respondent No. 2 are equally co-owners of the said property. She states that since the matter has been settled between the parties and it is a family dispute regarding the family property, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful pmpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 410/2010 under Sections 420/468/467/461/ 120B IPC registered at PS Mandawali Fazad Pur, Delhi and proceedings W.P.(CRL)1570/2011 >) pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of Order dasti. NOVEMBER 16, 2011

MUKTA GUPTA, J. 'vn' A W.P.(CRL) 1570/2011 Page 3 of3

Case details

Parties and counsel

Sim- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1570/2011 MAHARAJ SINGH @ MOPIAN & ANR Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Tyagi, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Additional Standing Counsel and Mr. Nikhil Menon, Advocate for the State with SI Narender Kumar. Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.