VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Noor Hasan v. State of NCT Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
21 November 2011
Bench
M.L. Mehtaauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 1634/2011

Judgment

ORDER zt.tr.20ll Crl. M.A. No. 18140/2011 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 1634/2011 Notice Ms. Jasbir Kaur, Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State. In view of the urgency explained by the petitioner, I have heard the matter finally. This is an application for bail of the accused for the offence under Section 328/3231376/506/509IPC in FIR No. 30112011 registered at P.S. Jyoti Nagar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case as he was landlord of the prosecutrix and there was a dispute regarding vacation of the suit premises. He submitted that this case has been filed against the petitioner so as to deter from seeking vacation of the ! Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. rt premises. He has submitted that the father of the prosecutrix has also filed a suit for permanent injunction against the accused/petitiqner which was withdrawn by hirn on2t.07.2011. Having perused the FIR and the other material available on record, it is seen that there are specific allegations against the petitioner for having cornmitted rape of the prosecutrix. It is also $een that the statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C by learned Metropolitan Magistrate wherein the prosecutrix has made clear allegations regarding commission of her rape !y the petitioner and further that she was continuously rapea(by the petitioner and co-accused Dr. Farooq. She also stated that the accused has taken her nude photggraphs and also made videq film of her during the course of commission of rape. She further stated that she was forced to get aborted and on her refusal she was threaten to be killed. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and seriousness of the offence, the petitioner is not entitled for the bail. Hence, the bail application stands dismissed. .- <J4,'4fl--l--, M. T. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 21, 2011 b

Case details

Parties and counsel

$-52 * IN THE ITIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1634120II NOOR HASAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Yash Anand, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State "h CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.