- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 19 November 2025
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manoj Jain
- Case no.
- CRL.A. 549/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
19.11.2025
¶1Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal in question was taken up by learned Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA on 13th instant and the learned Tribunal has held that the penalty imposed upon the appellant Company i.e., M/s Ralson Industries Ltd. was on the higher side and, therefore, the penalty amount has now been reduced to Rs. 5 lacs. She submits that in view of the abovesaid subsequent Order dated 13.11.2025, nothing survives in the present appeal and, therefore, she does not press the same.
¶2A copy of Order dated 13.11.2025 passed by learned Appellate Tribunal has also been shown during the course of the proceeding. Same is directed to be taken on record.
¶3In view of the above said order and the above said statement made by learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J MANOJ JAIN, J NOVEMBER 19, 2025/rs/ht This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 549/2016 & CRL.M.A. 9337/2016 M/S RALSON INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Appellant Through: Ms. Urvi Syal and Ms. Bhumi Agarwal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anupam S Sharrma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.