VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Pawan Kumar @ Diggi v. The State (Nct of Delhi ) & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
14 November 2017
Bench
Pratibha Raniauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 1897/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

14.11.2017

¶1By way of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to strike off his name from the surveillance register. He also prayed that his history sheet be closed and the data in the crime record be also corrected by not showing his name like a convict.

¶2Neither the petitioner nor the main counsel for the petitioner has appeared despite repeated passovers.

¶3The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

PRATIBHA RANI, J. NOVEMBER 14, 2017 'pg'

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1897/2016 PAWAN KUMAR @ DIGGI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Sarita, proxy counsel versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Mr.Mohit Sharma & Ms.Jyoti Babbar, Advocates with Inspector Satish Chandra PS Badarpur CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.