N.Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India and Ors

ANIL KUMAR, J. *

CM No.18262/2011

This is an application by the petitioner/applicant seeking to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate legal proceedings as may be available to him under rules and regulations.

Issue notice to the respondents/non-applicants. Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and, on instructions, states that reply to the application is not to be filed.

WP(C) No.7706/2011

For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the petitioner/applicant is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file such legal proceedings as may be available to the petitioner in his facts and circumstances.

W.P.(C) No.7706/2011

At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take such legal proceedings as may be available to the petitioner in the facts and circumstances.

All the pending applications are also disposed of.

Dasti.

ANIL KUMAR, J.

SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J. NOVEMBER 17, 2011. vk

WP(C) No.7706/2011 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.7706/2011 & CM No.18262/2011 % Date of Decision: 17.11.2011 Commander N.Rajesh Kumar …. Petitioner Through Mr.Ravi S.S.Chauhan, Advocate Versus UOI & Ors. …. Respondents Through Ms.Tinu Bajwa & Ms.Sahila Lamba, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA 1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?