- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 December 2010
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 239/2010
Judgment
ORDER %
07.12.2010 On 20.10.2010, the counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits and some time may be given to the petitionerto vacate the premises in question. Today also same thing is stated by the counsel for petitioner. Both the respondents are present with counsel and they have agreed to give time till 07.12.2011 to the petitioner to vacate the premises in question and it is stated that the respondents will not execute the eviction order till then. In view of above statement given by the counsel for parties, the present petition and pending application stand dismissed as not pressed. The petitioner is granted time till 07.12.2011 to vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual undertaking within two weeks with a copy to the respondent. Renotify on 06.01.2011. In the meanwhile, the respondents will not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing. The parties to appear in person on the next date. VEENA BIRBAL,J DECEMBER 07, 2010 , . . U! J iP srb "i • I > • -fc-' . fv.i ^3 " (? , ..--C ^ // Jh'' ch-^- Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
32. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 239/2010 & CM 18603/2010 RAKESH & ORS Petitioner Through Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Adv. versus SATYA NARAIN BHARDWAJ & ANR Respondent Through Mr. Prem Kumar with Mr. Girish Kumar, Adv. CORAM; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICEVEENA BIRBAL
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.