- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2011
- Bench
- M.L. Mehta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3589/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
15.11.2011 The parties are present in person. The petitioners are identified by their counsel and respondent No.2 is identified by the counsel as well as by the I.O. The petitioner present in the court states that he was able to contact the photographer Manoj and has also been able to collect the video and photographs of his marriage. With regard to negatives of photographs, it is stated that the photos were taken by the Digital camera which does not have negatives. The parties have arrived at a settlement. In pursuance thereto, the petitioner Vinod Kumar and respondent Anjna have obtained divorce by mutual consent and are living separately. The photographs in original and video cassette have been handed over to the respondent Anjna. In pursuance of the agreement a pay order of Rs.50,000/- has been given to the respondent Anjna by the petitioner Vinod Kumar today in the court. In view of this, the respondent Anjna is now left with no claims or grievances against the petitioners. > Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, no useful purpose will be served by continuing with FIR No. 426/2007 PS Desh Bandu Gupta Road, New Delhi under Sec. 498-A/406/34 IPG. Gonsequently,FIR No. 426/2007 PS Desh Bandu Gupta Road, New Delhi under Sec. 498-A/406/34 IPG and all the proceedings arising therefrom are herebyquashed.The personaland the surety bonds are discharged. It is stated that the parties are living their lives independently and will not misuse the photographs etc. The petition stands disposed of. Order dasti. M.L. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 15, 2011 Vaj'
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3589/2011 VINOD KUMAR BAHOT & ORS Petitioner Through IMr. Ashesh Kumar and Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR Respondent Through Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.