- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 6 November 2013
- Bench
- Mx. Mehta
- Case no.
- CS(OS) 2634/2012
Judgment
ORDER %
06.11.2013 This is a joint application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC filed by the plaintiffand the defendantstating that they have arrived at a compromise amongst themselves on the terms and conditions as stipulated therein. A cheque of Rs. 11,500/-is also being paid to the plaintiffby the defendant, which the plaintiffshall donatetowardsa charity for the empowennentand protection of women. Both the parties to remain bound by the tenns and conditions of the settlement. In view of the compromiseairiA'edat between the parties, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiffand againsttlie defendant in terms of the Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. t •/ / prayers (a) to (d). Decree be drawn accordingly. The court fees may be refundedto theplaintiffin viewof Section16-Aof theCourtFees Act. MX. MEHTA,J NOVEMBER 06,2013/akb
Case details
Parties and counsel
f $-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + lA 17754/2013 in CS(OS) 2634/2012 DIAGEO BRANDS B.V Through: Ms.Ekta Sarin, Adv. versus BEWAKOFF BRANDS PVT LTD " Plaintiff Defendant Through: Mr.Pradeep Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.