Raj Kumar Lal v. Aruna Singh & Ors

ORDER %

19.09.2012 This petition seeks assailing the order dated 15.5.2011 of Sr.Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, whereby the application under Section 7 Rule , 11 CPC filed by the petitioner for rejection of the plaint, who was the defendant No. 1 in the suit, was dismissed. Heard. The plaintiff had filed a suit claiming herself to be the owner of the suit propertyvide documentssuch as GPA dated 26.5.1993,allegedly ; I executedby the defendantNo. 2 in his favour. The petitioner,as defendant j no. 1 has disputed the claim of the ownership of the premises by the respondent/plaintiff,alleginghim to be the owner thereofhavingpurchased the same by virtue of documents such as GPA, Agreement to Sale and Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. K. Purchaseetc., Receiptetc. Boththe partieshave set up their claimsbasedon the different sets of documents and which is a triable issue. I do not see any infirmity or illegality in the impugnedorder. The petition has no merit and is hereby dismissed. K M.L. MEHTA,J SEPTEMBER 19, 2012U

/ $--28 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 115/2012, CM 16499-16501/2012 RAJ KUMAR LAL Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Goel, Adv. Versus ARUNA SINGH & ORS Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MX. MEHTA