- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 6 December 2010
- Bench
- Shiv Narayan Dhingra
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1419/2010
Judgment
JUDGMENT
¶1By way of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed an order 9th August 2010 whereby the application of petitioner for grant of parole was dismissed.
¶2The petitioner is undergoing sentence for ransom kidnapping. His appeal was dismissed by this Court on 14th December 2007. It seems that the petitioner was a hardened criminal as he was involved in another case of ransom kidnapping for which he is facing trial. Looking at the antecedents of the petitioner, I am afraid there is every possibility that the petitioner if released on parole, may indulge into another heinous crime. I find no reason to allow this petition. The petition is hereby dismissed.
December 06, 2010
SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J rd
Case details
Parties and counsel
WP(Crl.) No. 1419/2010 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 24th November 2010 Date of Order: December 06, 2010 + W.P(Crl.) 1419/2010 % 06.12.2010 Rakesh Saraha ...Petitioner Versus State ...Respondent Counsels: Ms. Neha Jain for petitioner. Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State/respondent. JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA 1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? 3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.