Syed Raif Sayeed v. Intazar Ali

ORDER %

10.07.2013

¶1The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Trial Court vide order dated ll"^ February, 2013, has dismissedthe complaintsand therefore,these mattershave become infructuous. The certifiedcopy ofthe order dated ll'"' February, 2013 is taken on record.

¶2The petitions are disposed of as infructuous. J.R. MIDHA, J JULY 10, 2013 aj

5 to 7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2856/2012 and CrLM.A.No.14228/2012 SYED RAIF SAYEED Petitioner Through: Mr. AngarHusainandMr. S. Rehman, Advs. versus INTAZARALI Respondent Through: None. + CRL.M.C. 2868/2012 and Crl.M.A.No. 14278/2012 SYED RAIF SAYEED Petitioner Through: Mr. Angar Husainand Mr. S. Rehman, Advs. versus INTAZAR ALI Respondent Through: None. + CRL.M.C. 2869/2012 and Crl.M.A.No. 14279/2012 SYED RAIF SAYEED Petitioner Through; Mr. AngarHusainandMr. S. Rehman, Advs. versus INTAZAR ALI Respondent Through: None. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA