- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 1 December 2010
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 250/2010
Judgment
"r t2. % ot.r2.20ro Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Dubey, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. Sunil Malhotra with Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Adv. for respondent. Counsel for the petitioner submits'that under the instructions flom the petitioner he is making the statement that the petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits. lt is stated that the petitioner is a sick person and some time be given to him to vacate the premises in question. The counsel for the respondent is present with attorney of the respondent. Under the instructions from the respondent, the counsel for the respondent states that the. respondent has no objection in granting time to the petitioner up to 30.11.201.1 and the respondent will not execute the eviction order till then' ln view of above statement given by the counsel for parties the present petition and pending application stand disposed of as not pressed. The petitioner is granted time till 30.11.2011 to vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual undertaking by the petitioner within two weeks with a copy to the respondent. shall The Renotify on 10.01.2011. In the meanwhile, the respondent not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing. parties to appear in person on the next date.;;*r DECEMBER 1, 2O].0 srb - lCd ,n /*r/rrr, ,{, ycolr^ oP Feilavt - Melh/g *l Nrhl ( V/)t^,; RC.REV. NO.2 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.