- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2012
- Bench
- S. Muralidhar
- Case no.
- O.M.P. 685/2012
Judgment
ORDER
08.LL.2012
¶1The parties are agteeable that the disputes, which form the subject matter of these two petitions, can bg referred to a sole Arbitrator appointed b1' this Court.
¶2This Court, accordingly, appoints Justice Mukul Mudgal, a forurer Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana (rlo C-30, l't Floor, Nizarnuddin East, New Delhi-110013; Mobile No. 9818000250) as a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties including their claims and counter-claims. Justice Mudgal will comrnunicate to the parties his tenns. All the contentions of the parties are left open to be uged before the learned Arbitrator. Interim reliefs can be sought by either party, in accordance with law, befbre the learned Arbitrator.
¶3These petitions are disposed of in the above terrns'
¶4A copy of this order be given dasti. A copy of this order be sent to Justice Mudgal through special messenger forthwith.
S. MURALIDHAR, J. NOVEMBER O8,2OL2 /{K. 6,{^ iF )20\^ltu rllJ q k"rbtvth
Case details
Parties and counsel
o S-27 and 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 662 of 2012 I(APIL CHOPRA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Mishra and Mr. Kapil Chopra, Advocates. Versus SATISH CHOPRA & ORS ..... Respondents Tluough: Mr. Vibhu Bakhru, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Surnit and Mf. Satish Chopra. AND ,/ F.NL.P.685 of 2012 SATISH CHOPRA & ANR ..... Petitioners Tluough: Mr. Vibhu Bakhru, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Surnit and Mr. Satish Chopra. Versus KAPTL CHOPRA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: i\4r. Sanjay Mishra and Mr. Kapil Chopra, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.