Dilshad v. State

ORDER %

24.07.2013

¶1As per the nominal roll of the appellant/petitioner, he has undergone sentence for a period of eight years, four months and seven days and earned remission for a period of one year, five months and ten days and thus his unexpired portion of sentence is two months and ten days (IFP).

¶2Counsel for the appellant/petitioner states on instructions from the wife of the appellant/petitioner that the appellant/petitioner does not wish to pursue the present appeal and the CrI.M.C in view of the limited period of the unexpired portion of sentence.

¶3In view of the aforesaid submission, the present appeal and the CrI.MC are disposed of. HIMA KOHLI, J JULY 24, 2013/rkb Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRLA. 390/1999 and CRL.M.C. 2698/2012 DILSHAD Appellant/Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Vohra, Advocate with the wife of the appellant, Ms. Taira in person, versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma, Addl. PP with SI Hukum Singh, PS: Seema Puri and SI Sunil Sharma, PS: Gokul Puri. CORAM; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI