- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 16 August 2010
- Bench
- Shiv Narayan Dhingra
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2619/2010
Judgment
ORDER
16.08.2010 This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by the petitioner and respondents no.2 and 3 for quashing of FIR No.33 of 2009 under Sections 419/420/461/468 read with Section 34 IPC Police Station Maurice Nagar, Delhi on the ground that the parties have compromised the matter. The petitioner and accused are real sisters and after registration of present FIR better sense prevailed upon the accused and they compromised the matter with the complainant. Complainant is present in the Court and identified by her counsel. She submits that she has compromised the matter with the accused/ respondents no.2 and 3. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the petition is allowed and FIR No.33 of 2009 under Sections 419/420/461/468 read with Section 34 IPC Police Station Maurice Nagar, Delhi emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. The petition stands disposed of in terms of above o AUGUST 16, 2010 rd the proceedings J Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. .. $-2 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2619/2010 PENZY MORGAN Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Through Mr. Sunil Sharma, Addi. PP CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA ORDER
10.02.2011 Crl. M.A.17669/2010 ..... Petitioner ..... Respondent This application has been made for correction of typographical error in the order dated 161h August, 2010 wherein FIR has been mentioned as 33 of 2009 in stead of FIR No. 33 of 2003. Perusal of record shows that petition was made in respect of FIR No. 33 of 2003. The application is allowed. FIR no. in the order dated 16.08.2010 shall be read as 33 of 2003 in place of FIR no. 33 of 2009. The application stands disposed of. FEBRUARY 10, 2011 acm k SHIV DHINGRA,J
Case details
Parties and counsel
• $tv24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2619/2010 O/o PENZY MORGAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Lalit Anand, Advocate versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.