- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 15 November 2016
- Bench
- S.Muralidhar
- Case no.
- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 115/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
15.11.2016
¶1Considering that a petition under Section 11 of the Act has been filed by the Petitioner before the Bombay High Court and considering that no interim order has been passed in this petition till date, it is directed that it will be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate interim orders in the arbitral proceedings in accordance with law as and when an Arbitrator is appointed. It is made clear that this Court has not decided the objection raised by the Respondent to the maintainability of this petition in this Court.
¶2The petition is disposed of in the above terms. The application is also disposed of.
S. MURALIDHAR, J NOVEMBER 15, 2016 mg
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 19. + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 115/2016 & IA 6398/2016 K RISE RETAILS PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.P. Singh Chawla, Ms. Shagun Parashar, Advocates. versus FALGUNI CREATIONS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Alok Mahajan, Mr Rajesh Arya And Mr. Abhay Mahajan, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.