- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 18 November 2011
- Bench
- G.S.Sistani
- Case no.
- ARB.P. 242/2011
Judgment
ORDER o/
18.11.2011 T1 IF,\ nf the Arbitrstion S' This is a petition under Sec ion Conciliation Act, seeking of the matter, petitioner has petitioner submits that dun g Accountant, as an arbitrator. appointed Sh.P.P. 3obmits that respondent has Counsel for the respondent arbitrator Both the parties appointed Mr.Sanjay Bansal, Advocate as^n arbitrator^ submit that withih two weeks from today. It is umpire be appointed y appointed by the Arbitrators within "™ .»...» » Umpire. 't is uyicc consultation with the parties. in view of above, petition stands disposed . "g.s.'sistawij MOVEMBESRi 18, 2011 ssn Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Case details
Parties and counsel
$' i + ARB.P. 242/2011 ....Petitioner BHUPENDRA^CHATURVE^^^^^^ Choudhari, Advocate j versus ! ....Respondent INDIA EXPOS^TION^MART^^^^^^^^^^^ ; H°0N BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ■%■
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.